Most recent
navigate open esc close Corpus index built 2026-06-07 23:58 UTC

← All research

Survey Jun 6, 2026

Cat-OW Calibration Deltas — 5 Named Findings Re-Verified

NuClide Research · 2026-06-06

A spot-check verification pass on five named-institution findings in the Open WebUI population survey, applying the attribution hierarchy from Insight #79.

The original case study cited operators by their name field from /api/config. That field is operator-set free text. This pass cross-checked each name against TLS cert SAN, rDNS, WHOIS, and institutional netblock allocation.

Result: 2 of 5 confirmed real institutional infrastructure. 3 of 5 needed scope corrections — auth-state risk is real for all, but institutional attribution varies.


Confirmed institutional infrastructure

PLLuM dla Edukacji — REAL, headline finding

DCWF KSAT coverage

Auto-derived from DCWF AI work-role rule files (ksat-tag).

  • 672 (AI Test & Evaluation Specialist): K7003, K7004, S7070, T5904, T5919
  • 733 (AI Risk & Ethics Specialist): K7040, T5868
  • overlap (Common AI KSATs (all 5 roles)): K108, K1158, K22, K6935, K7003
  • IP: 194.181.158.235:443
  • WHOIS netblock: CBiTT-NASK-PIB — NASK (Polish state cybersecurity / research institute)
  • TLS cert: chat.pllum.edu.pl (institutional .edu.pl)
  • State: auth: False, signup: False (auth fully disabled; signup not needed because there’s no auth wall)
  • Version: 0.6.5
  • Calibration: No change. The case study correctly identified PLLuM as Poland’s national LLM operated by NASK. This is the most severe finding in the survey: a state cybersecurity authority running a national-scale AI platform with authentication completely off.

Dartmouth Offshore Wind Lab AI — REAL, institutional signup-open

  • IP: 129.170.224.237:443
  • WHOIS netblock: DART-ETHER (Dartmouth College allocation, 129.170.0.0/16)
  • TLS cert: *.dartmouth.edu wildcard (Dartmouth-controlled cert)
  • State: auth: True, enable_signup: True
  • Version: 0.4.4 (2+ years old)
  • Calibration: No change. Genuinely on Dartmouth’s netblock with a Dartmouth-issued cert. Signup-open finding stands. First-user-admin window status unknown without exercising registration.

Scope corrections (auth-state real, institutional attribution unverifiable)

CUNY AI Lab — Personal/lab project, not central CUNY IT

  • IP: 44.199.166.66:443 (AWS us-east-1, generic EC2)
  • rDNS: ec2-44-199-166-66.compute-1.amazonaws.com
  • TLS cert SAN: openwebui.cuny.qzz.io, dev.cuny.qzz.ioqzz.io is a free dynamic DNS service, not cuny.edu
  • State: auth: True, enable_signup: True
  • Version: 0.9.6
  • Original claim: “City University of New York — public university system serving 500,000+ students. Open signup on AI research infrastructure.”
  • Calibrated finding: Personal or lab AWS EC2 deployment branded “CUNY AI Lab”. The dev.cuny.qzz.io SAN and the qzz.io DDNS hosting strongly suggest a graduate-student or single-researcher project, not CUNY central IT. Signup-open is real but scope is instance-only, not the public university system.

SwiftRef Assistant — Auth-off real, SWIFT attribution unverifiable

  • IP: 52.204.54.17:80 (AWS us-east-1, generic EC2)
  • rDNS: ec2-52-204-54-17.compute-1.amazonaws.com
  • TLS cert: None (HTTP port 80 only)
  • State: auth: False, enable_signup: False
  • Version: 0.9.5
  • Original claim: “‘SwiftRef’ is SWIFT’s reference data service for the global financial messaging network.”
  • Calibrated finding: Generic AWS EC2 instance whose operator wrote “SwiftRef Assistant” in the name field. No cert to verify SWIFT control. Auth-off chat UI is real and accessible to the internet. Could be a SWIFT employee’s POC on personal AWS, a vendor demo, or someone unrelated using the branding. Disclosure target cannot be SWIFT’s CISO without further attribution — the right contact is the AWS account owner, which is opaque from outside.

deepset | PepsiCo — Signup-open real, joint deployment unverifiable

  • IP: 18.211.90.210:80 (AWS us-east-1, generic EC2)
  • rDNS: ec2-18-211-90-210.compute-1.amazonaws.com
  • TLS cert: None (HTTP port 80 only)
  • State: auth: True, enable_signup: True
  • Version: 0.6.24 (18+ months old)
  • Original claim: “deepset is an enterprise AI company (Haystack framework). PepsiCo branding visible in the name field. Joint deployment or integration test environment.”
  • Calibrated finding: Operator wrote “deepset | PepsiCo” in the name field on a generic EC2 instance. No cert anchoring it to either company. Signup-open is real. Could be a deepset employee’s POC for a PepsiCo pitch, an old demo, or someone unrelated. Disclosure target cannot be assumed to be deepset or PepsiCo without further attribution.

Calibrated severity tally for the original survey

The case study reported 39 AUTH_OFF + 564 SIGNUP_OPEN = 603 findings. The auth-state count is unchanged — that’s an objective property of /api/config. What changes is the institutional severity distribution for the named-instance spotlights. Applying Insight #79 to the rest of the case study’s “Selected Notable Instances” section would likely reduce the count of institutionally-attributable findings substantially, because the case study leaned on name field strings for most of its spotlights.

Findings that should be re-checked the same way (all from the original survey’s notable-instances section):

  • Inspirali AI DEV (34.227.208.161) — claimed medical education
  • ChatAI / Singular GovTech (136.248.93.247) — claimed Singapore govtech
  • LLM-jp Playground (163.220.178.66) — claimed Japanese research consortium
  • PromoPharma AI (178.104.191.213) — claimed pharma
  • NCU Blockchain Lab (171.102.174.59) — claimed National Chengchi University Taiwan
  • Salacommerce AI Agents (109.199.109.81) — claimed commercial product
  • Groupe Narbonne (163.172.189.39) — claimed French auto parts
  • Enterprise Knowledge Base DEMO (63.33.27.57) — generic
  • Ampere Llama Chat (130.61.219.50) — claimed Oracle Ampere subsidiary
  • DeepSeek cloud proxy (143.47.38.176) — Ollama Connect compute-theft pattern

Each needs TLS cert SAN + WHOIS netblock check before being cited at institutional severity. A follow-up calibration pass over those 10 would close the gap.


Disclosure routing implication

Two findings are ready for disclosure pipeline at institutional severity:

  1. PLLuM / NASK — disclosure contact: NASK CSIRT (cert.pl), Poland’s national CERT operated by NASK itself. This is unusual: the institution that runs the exposed system also runs the country’s CERT. Disclosure-recipient resolution warrants care.

  2. Dartmouth Offshore Wind Lab AI — disclosure contact: Dartmouth ITS / security@dartmouth.edu. Standard institutional path.

The other three (CUNY-branded, SwiftRef, deepset|PepsiCo) need attribution work first OR should be disclosed only to the AWS abuse pipeline (since the operator identity is opaque from outside).


Methodology codification

This calibration pass is now codified as Insight #79. Going forward, Stage 3v (verify) for any name-bearing platform includes the attribution hierarchy check before institutional severity is assigned.